🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.